Muslims were declared government land as government… Board hanged, also occupied

Case of prized 250 crore land of Mahalakshmi Nagar Main Road, priest sold by contempt of court order

Indore. The Agriban sold 11 Muslims (Muslims) sold as Shri Ram Temple and Shri Khedaapati Hanuman Temple (Sri Khedaapati Hanuman Temple) The land of Pipalyakumar (Pipalyakumar), after that Collector Ashish Singh declared this land as government, and the board was declared government today The price of this land 2.94 acres is not less than Rs 250 crore, because the said land is present on Mahalakshmi Nagar Man Road in front of Bombay Hospital. The Collector issued an order regarding this land on 23 July. However, the landowners have also challenged the court. SDM Juni Indore has completed the process regarding the said land as per the instructions given by the Revenue Board of Revenue Court in 15.06.2016.

In the Jai Patra in favor of the court order and the priest, it was clearly written that the said land has been given for the worship of Shri Ram Temple and Khedapati Temple and due to this, in 1925-26, in 1925-26, Khasra Number 206 acre 2.94 acres of land has been recorded in the name of Khedapati Temple Pujari Nandaram Bald Ukardas Bairagi and this land is recorded from 1997-98 to the year 1997-98-98-98 Khedapati temple administrator was registered in the name of Collector. But in 15.12.1995, in the decision passed by the court and in the order, it was also clear that the land of the said temple was given only for worship. Despite this, due to this illegally done registries, nominations were also made. 11 pieces of this land were broken, Imtiaz father Abdul Razak, Mohammad Salim, Mohammad Farooq, Abeda husband Mohammad Farooq, Rejwan Mohammad Farooq, Mohammad Naeem, Mohammad Ashfaq, Mohammad Salim, Anjum husband Salim, Abdul Razzaq, Nurmohmah, Abdul Majid, Iqbal’s father Abdul and Mohammad Maz Maz and others. On the instructions of the Collector, SDM Juni Indore Pradeep Soni investigated all the documents and the order passed by the Court of Revenue and on the basis of the instructions given by the Ministry of Religious Trust and Religion on the basis of the instructions of the Ministry of Religion and Religion on 25 October 2014, in which it was found that the priest did not have the rights to sell the land and the government land of this Piplyakumar did not have the government land survey number 206 in the revolutionary The revision was taken, due to which Collector Ashish Singh canceled the nomination orders and directed Tehsildar Juni Indore that this land of the temple should be mentioned in the name of the administrator collector in column number 3. Action was also taken to put boards and take possession on the spot today.